which type is supposed to be more accurate?

[6L strokin]

a mustang or dynojet? IMO the hp is closer to being actual on a dynojet from the experience with my truck since i only put down like 380 on a mustang and 490 on a dynojet. but the torque seems a little low on the dynojet....860 on it and high on the mustang....1050.

some people swear by the mustang dyno and vica versa......but is there any type of calculation or anything to figure out the actual? and theres a "new dyno in town" lol and this guy keeps wanting people to dyno on it cuz it will new track times and all kinds a crazy shit, this BS or for real..?

[heinzboy]

its looks like things are backwards.....

380 and 860 look right
490 and 1050 look ok but tq is in the high side

[6L strokin]

actually on the mustang dyno my truck did (with pane)
380/1050

on the dynojet it did (with pane)
490/860

so mustang dyno i know is low hp...i think with just a tune i did like
335/9**?

on the on dynojet on tune only was around
410/725

so to me sounds like dynojets hp is more accurate since we come stock with around 300 to the wheel correct? but the tq seems a little low......whereas the mustang tq seems high....so IMO it almost seems pointless to spin the rollers on a mustang....??

[PSDPlayer]

Deppends on how heavy the roller is. We use a Dynojet 248HW which is the heavy and wide version. A 6.0L will usually be putting down (high 300s/mid 700s) (mid 400s/mid 800s) (low 500s/low 900s) (Low to mid 600s/ 1000-1100 ft lbs). Example would be the king ranch truck we did. Peak hp and torque from it was 668/1115 on spray and 537/909 on motor.

[6L strokin]

so the dynojets are more accurate then....490/860 with propane...410/720 on tune....?

[PSDPlayer]

Those numbers do sound correct.

[6L strokin]

so is there any imparticular reason why 6.0s down multiply the torqe #s as much as most diesels do...?

[PSDPlayer]

Compared to what? A dodge? Its a v8. v8 better for hp. straight 6 better for torque.